In October, Gary Johnson will be a welcome addition.
Gary Johnson and Bill was born – the former Republican Party of New Mexico and Massachusetts governors who now heads the Liberal Party ticket – must adopt their failure to qualify for the first debate.
Appoint a committee of presidential debates ceiling too high for the candidates of the third party to own the podium at Hofstra University on September 26:
To qualify, and was a candidate to be eligible constitutionally to work,
appear on the ballots enough to have a mathematical chance of winning a majority of votes in the electoral college, and show support for at least about 15 percent in five national polls.
8.4 percent support in opinion polls chosen by the panel, Johnson did not make the cut.
Johnson’s campaign has published an online petition that calls for Born panel discussion to allow for debate liberals. With more than 875,000 signatures on the Internet,
and the campaign is likely to meet its goal of $ 1 million.
I think that’s the wrong tactic. Sure, you can say that the panel is “manipulation”,
as Johnson said, with a very large number of former big shots big party.
If he wants panel to accommodate the candidates of the third party, it can be stuck to the first two criteria.
And either to have different rules for one of the discussions to accommodate strangers.
But this did not happen, and it did not look good to ask the people who control the field to lower its standards so that you can play.
Besides, I think Johnson wins when Americans Tune debate Monday night and see in the harsh glare of the spotlight debate is best that both parties have to offer – Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.
According to the median polling RealClearPolitics, 54.9 percent of voters have negative views of Clinton,
while 57.3 have a negative view of Trump. You absolutely know that more people will despise them by November 8.
If I were Johnson, I do not want to be anywhere near the stage when Clinton and Trump finally facing off.
Ashfaq Musharraf, the BBC Lester Holt. This season has focused silly campaign on what the candidates say much more than what they do.
If Holt committed to this model, say, asks Trump if Trump was trying to provoke violence against Clinton when Clinton proposed his bodyguards disarmed. (Quoth Donald:
“I do not want guns Let’s see what happens carrying their guns away and it will be very dangerous …”)
Trump will be willing to criticize Holt as the elite media that hides behind security walls.
If Holt Clinton asked difficult questions about her emails Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
said that the Democrats are targeted to the same treatment reserved to Matt Lauer.
My suggestion: Ask Clinton what she means when she says that everything is on the responsibility for its decision to use home brew Telecom is very sensitive server.
What exactly happens when the bear responsibility?
Last week, it was Johnson’s turn to squirm when Mike Barnicle MSNBC was asked what he would do about Aleppo. “What are the Aleppo” he answered Johnson –
confirms that Syria is not a major concern for the Liberal candidate. After that Johnson did not try to make excuses.
He admitted it looked bad. They are often open-ended questions that lead to recriminations.
This is another reason for the Liberals to be happy to sit down first dance.
Johnson was born on the right to turn their attention to the discussions October.
Let Clinton and Trump do their worst to each other – of voters believe swells from the main party with Machiavellian moves,
the more they have a real human being who wants the government to do better by doing less crave.